Could Not Claim Interface 0 Invalid Configuration 0
Browse other questions tagged python pyusb or ask your own question. The programming shows no errors but gets prolonged when the the CPU gets choked off. I am trying to connect to a Canon PowerShot G12 using libusb-win32. Subject: Re: [Libusb-win32-devel] Cannot claim interface 0 using configuration 0 On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO)
I believe I am using the latest version of the software, so it doesn't look as if the device number is set to 0, it looks like its set to 1, You shou -- Xiaofan Re: [Libusb-win32-devel] Bulk USB transfers works with USB3.0 ports and not with USB2.0 From: Xiaofan Chen
Edit: Mind that you need to install the "tcl" package !! # apt-get install tcl Top Khaoz Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:37 pm Posts: 8Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:55 The programming (CPU intensive) took forever, but otherwise the CPU idles when mining. Many thanks indeed! It is a bug in the long polling thread which is triggered if mining pool/server does not return a valid long polling address and if no other long polling address is
Or even a note from usb_modeswitch ? 1. /lib/udev/rules.d is populated with a lot of rules son usb_modeswitch isn't the only one. If I try running them in single mode, if I program them too quickly, the later boards also gets the prolonged programming time and DCD. Is this normal? Top Khaoz Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:33 am Posts: 8Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:55 pm Thanks I'm going to try it now Edit: It sure seems to be a
I also noticed that when there is a delay in Long-Poll, the CPU goes crazy as well, but otherwise the CPU is nice and idle. SourceForge Browse Enterprise Blog Deals Help Create Log In or Join Solution Centers Go Parallel Resources Newsletters Cloud Storage Providers Business VoIP Providers Call Center Providers Thanks for helping keep SourceForge Traceback (most recent call last): File "stm32f4usb-windows.py", line 15, in dev.write(1, sys.argv, 0, 100) File "C:\comp\Python27\lib\site-packages\pyusb-1.0.0b1-py2.7.egg\usb\core.py", line 626, in write self._ctx.managed_claim_interface(self, intf) File "C:\comp\Python27\lib\site-packages\pyusb-1.0.0b1-py2.7.egg\usb\core.py", line 112, in managed_claim_interface self.backend.claim_interface(self.handle, i) File I am not sure why your CPU is being used.
The name of some components has changed and the old ones will not be overwritten by the new ones, staying active. Anybody else noticed the long programming time? ssoloski commented Jun 4, 2014 Since you were able to recreate the issue, do you still want me to post my error log? I want to make sure the filters at the beginning of the rules do not prevent anything.
If you choose to, you have to "make integrated_uninstall" your current version. http://wiki.ztex.de/doku.php?id=en:discussions:windows_7_problems rabryan pushed a commit to rabryan/libusb that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2014 Richard Bryan
but it fails with USB2.0. >> >> I am using the libusb-win32 APIs. >> >> The failure is always at usb_claim_interface: >>  libusb0-dll:err [claim_interface] could not claim interface 0, >> Check This Out Delete anything with "usb_modeswitch" in its name and reinstall the 1.1.0 package with logging on. No, thanks SourceForge Browse Enterprise Blog Deals Help Create Log In or Join Solution Centers Go Parallel Resources Newsletters Cloud Storage Providers Business VoIP Providers Call Center Providers Thanks for helping antirack: Quote from: CAcoinsAnybody else noticed the long programming time?I have seen 3000+ ms or 7000+ ms, during the past two days testing (but nothing in between).
The "rules" file is probably not evaluated correctly. komar007: --- Quote from: Glissant on Sun, 17 March 2013, 11:45:24 ---Really glad you are making some progress with the firmware. You don't need to do anything except plugging in. Source I have a sample program to demonstrate the issue; not sure how to attach it here though.
You should also make sure that without the isolator your > device work properly for both USB 3.0 ports and USB 2.0 ports for > different PCs, then in that case, Top Khaoz Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:34 am Posts: 8Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:55 pm well I deleted everything with usb_modeswitch in its name. We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox.
If you use the 1.1.0 release version now, mind that logging is off by default.
https://help.github.com/articles/github-flavored-markdown Contributor mcuee commented Jun 3, 2014 The original thread in libftdi mailing list. And I did see that same error for both 1.0.18 and 1.0.19-rc2. No. > Or should I perhaps use the value of bConfigurationValue? I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time.
Many improvements. You should also make sure that without the isolator your device work properly for both USB 3.0 ports and USB 2.0 ports for different PCs, then in that case, you can Contributor mcuee commented Jun 16, 2014 I enable libusbK.dll debugging and found out that there are many warnings, no so sure if this is a problem or not. 00000001 0.00000000  have a peek here Already have an account?
It almost worked heheh Here is the log of executing usb modeswitcher from the command line Code:Reading config file: /etc/usb-modeswitch.conf* usb-modeswitch: handle USB devices with multiple modes* Version 1.1.0 (C) Josua You should not need to edit anything. Do SSDs reduce the usefulness of Databases A real function problem Large loan at zero interest or very little interest? Maybe it is because of C compiler thingy.
Steve /* * check_libusb.c * * Created on: Jun 2, 2014 * Author: Steve */ #include
Thanks for your support, Aymen 2014-09-30 4:58 GMT+02:00 Xiaofan Chen
For others you need to enter scancode specifically for all the non character key. Claim Interface 1 instead and the error does not occur anymore. Please don't fill out this field. Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter: I agree to receive quotes, newsletters and other information from sourceforge.net and its partners regarding IT services and products.
Here is the dmesg when I try pluggin the modem after boot. You seem to have CSS turned off. I didn't need to make any modification and... What am I doing wrong here?
The first board in the series gets programmed fine with ~3000ms programming time, but then the ones afterwards gets long programming times (~5-6000ms). For some key, you can just press a character and it can assign it this way which is good and easy. Let me know if you need additional info... It is a good practice to include some important code snippets from a n external source to an answer if possible.